Physics & Astrophysics Paper Checker

Validate physics manuscripts for APS/AIP format compliance, equation completeness, data availability, and arXiv submission standards.

Check my manuscript, it's free

No account required · Results in <2 minutes · PDF, Word & LaTeX

Physics publishing requirements

Physics papers follow APS (American Physical Society) or AIP styles for Physical Review, Physics Letters, and related journals. Astrophysics papers in ApJ, MNRAS, and A&A follow their own conventions. Physics manuscripts require precise equation formatting, unit consistency (SI units unless otherwise specified), error analysis for all measurements, and increasingly, data and code availability. arXiv preprint submission is standard practice in physics and astrophysics before or alongside journal submission.

Physics publishing has its own culture and conventions that differ markedly from biology or social sciences. The arXiv preprint tradition, distinct reference styles across APS and AIP journals, heavy reliance on equations and notation, and specific data reporting standards all create opportunities for formatting mistakes that delay publication. Whether you're targeting Physical Review Letters, Nature Physics, or a specialized optics journal, the requirements below matter.

The arXiv-Journal Submission Workflow

Physics is unique among the sciences in its near-universal use of arXiv as a preprint server. Most physicists post to arXiv simultaneously with (or before) journal submission. This creates specific formatting considerations:

  • arXiv vs. journal formatting. arXiv accepts virtually any LaTeX format, but your journal submission must follow the publisher's template. Submitting a journal-formatted paper to arXiv is fine; submitting an arXiv-formatted paper to a journal usually isn't.
  • Version tracking. When your paper is accepted, update the arXiv version with the accepted manuscript and add the journal DOI. Many journals now require this.
  • Embargo considerations. Some journals (notably Nature Physics and Science) have media embargo policies that can conflict with arXiv posting. Check your target journal's preprint policy before posting.

CheckMyManuscript checks manuscript structure against journal requirements regardless of whether you've already posted to arXiv. We flag structural issues that arXiv won't catch: missing abstracts, incomplete author metadata, and formatting inconsistencies.

Reference Styles in Physics

Physics journals use two main citation systems:

  • APS / Physical Review journals: Numbered references in square brackets [1], ordered by first appearance. References include article titles (as of the 2016 style change). Author names use initials: "J. K. Smith."
  • AIP journals (Applied Physics Letters, Journal of Chemical Physics, etc.): Similar numbered system but with superscript numbers rather than brackets.
  • Nature Physics, Science, PRL letters: Each has minor variations on the numbered system.

The most common reference errors in physics papers: missing article titles (still common after the 2016 APS style change), incorrect journal abbreviations (Phys. Rev. Lett. vs. Physical Review Letters), missing DOIs, and inconsistent author name formatting.

Equations and Notation Standards

Physics papers are equation-heavy, and proper formatting is critical for readability and editorial acceptance:

  • Equation numbering. Number all displayed equations consecutively: (1), (2), (3). Reference equations as "Eq. (1)" or "as shown in (1)" — never "Equation 1" without parentheses.
  • Variable definition. Every variable must be defined at first use. Standard practice is to define variables immediately after the equation in a "where..." clause.
  • Units. Always use SI units unless there's a strong field-specific convention (electron-volts in particle physics, parsecs in astrophysics). Include a space between the number and unit: "5.2 eV" not "5.2eV."
  • Uncertainty reporting. Report measurement uncertainties consistently: "3.14 ± 0.02" or "3.14(2)" in condensed notation. Specify whether uncertainties are statistical, systematic, or combined.

Data and Code Availability

The physics community has moved toward open data and code sharing, though requirements vary by journal:

  • APS journals encourage data sharing and require a data availability statement
  • Nature Physics requires data availability and encourages code availability statements
  • Many journals now expect computational physics papers to include links to code repositories

If your paper involves simulations, provide sufficient detail for reproduction: software packages used (with version numbers), parameter files, and ideally a persistent repository link (Zenodo-archived GitHub, not just a GitHub URL).

Also see: [Mathematics paper checker](/for/mathematics-papers) | [Engineering paper checker](/for/engineering-papers) | [LaTeX paper checker](/for/latex-papers)

Physics paper checks

Equation completeness

Verify all symbols are defined and equations are properly numbered.

SI unit consistency

Check consistent use of SI units throughout.

Error analysis

Validate measurement uncertainties and error propagation are reported.

Data availability

Check for data availability and code repository statements.

Citation format

Validate APS/AIP or AAS reference style.

Abstract completeness

Verify physics abstract includes objective, methods, and key numerical results.

Checks relevant to this topic

Part of our 80+ automated checks

Symbol definitions

All mathematical symbols defined on first use.

Equation numbering

Consistent equation numbering and text references.

Unit consistency

SI units used consistently throughout.

Error reporting

Measurement uncertainties reported for all key values.

The practical edge your peers already use

Across disciplines and career stages, researchers reduce bottlenecks and submit with confidence: clearer drafts, easier guideline compliance, and less back and forth with co‑authors and reviewers.

I use it to review my students' papers. It instantly highlights typos, missing references, and unclear sections, helping me focus my feedback on the quality of the research instead of surface errors.

Ilyass, Professor in Mechanical Engineering, ÉTS Montréal

Ilyass

Professor in Mechanical Engineering, ÉTS Montréal

I relied on it throughout my thesis to strengthen my writing. It suggested clearer phrasing, improved flow between sections, and ensured my references were complete before the final deadline.

Manon, Master's Student in Speech Therapy

Manon

Master's Student in Speech Therapy

I write research in both Portuguese and English, and it adapts perfectly to either language. It provided precise feedback in Portuguese, helping me maintain academic tone and consistency across my drafts.

Afonso, PhD Candidate, UFPE

Afonso

PhD Candidate, UFPE

It gave excellent advice on how to rephrase and present ideas more clearly and concisely. The suggestions helped me refine my arguments and make my research more impactful.

Félix, Postdoc Researcher, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology

Félix

Postdoc Researcher, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology

A round of suggestions helped to generally refine the text of my paper and, moreover, to present some of its key points in a more focused form.

Oleg, Professor, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Oleg

Professor, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

I use it to review my students' papers. It instantly highlights typos, missing references, and unclear sections, helping me focus my feedback on the quality of the research instead of surface errors.

Ilyass, Professor in Mechanical Engineering, ÉTS Montréal

Ilyass

Professor in Mechanical Engineering, ÉTS Montréal

I relied on it throughout my thesis to strengthen my writing. It suggested clearer phrasing, improved flow between sections, and ensured my references were complete before the final deadline.

Manon, Master's Student in Speech Therapy

Manon

Master's Student in Speech Therapy

I write research in both Portuguese and English, and it adapts perfectly to either language. It provided precise feedback in Portuguese, helping me maintain academic tone and consistency across my drafts.

Afonso, PhD Candidate, UFPE

Afonso

PhD Candidate, UFPE

It gave excellent advice on how to rephrase and present ideas more clearly and concisely. The suggestions helped me refine my arguments and make my research more impactful.

Félix, Postdoc Researcher, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology

Félix

Postdoc Researcher, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology

A round of suggestions helped to generally refine the text of my paper and, moreover, to present some of its key points in a more focused form.

Oleg, Professor, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Oleg

Professor, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University

Frequently asked questions

In physics and astrophysics, arXiv preprint submission before or simultaneous with journal submission is standard practice and widely accepted. It increases visibility and can attract comments that improve the final submission.